Victorian community

Reporting corruption and misconduct

Victorians generally agree with a range of statements that identify reporting corruption is essential to ensure an ethical, fair, and democratic society.

Seventy-six per cent agree that “if I personally observed corruption or misconduct, I would definitely report it”, with 29 per cent strongly agreeing with this statement. This finding is consistent with the 2016 survey results. Victorians who identify as Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander and those aged between 18-34 years old are significantly less likely to agree that they would ‘definitely’ report corruption or misconduct (62% and 72% respectively). People living in regional locations and those aged 55 years and over were significantly more likely to agree they would make a report (83% and 81% respectively).

Most people (82%) are motivated to report corrupt behaviour or misconduct because they want and believe they deserve a public sector that is free of corruption; 80 per cent also believe it is in the best interests of the community to report corruption or misconduct. Preventing and dealing with corruption is key to maintaining a fair and democratic society for most Victorians (77%). Less than a third of Victorians (31%) agree that their friends and family would influence their decision to report corruption or misconduct.

Graph 4. Agreement with statements about reporting of public sector corruption or police misconduct (%)

IBAC is the organisation that most Victorians feel they would make a report to.

IBAC is the organisation the community is most likely to report corruption and misconduct to (54%). This is consistent across individual groups within the community. The Victorian Ombudsman (34%) and Victoria Police (33%) are the other organisations most likely to be approached.

Victorians aged 18-34 years old are significantly more likely to report to Victoria Police (39%) compared to the average, while Victorians aged 55 years and over and people who live with a disability are significantly more likely than average to make a report to the Victorian Ombudsman (43% respectively).

Graph 5. Who to report corruption to (%)

For those unlikely to report corruption or misconduct (<30 respondents), they feel nothing would happen (49%) or they could be personally impacted (39%).

There are some concerns among Victorians about the personal impacts of reporting corruption and misconduct.

A little over one third of Victorians (37%) believe that meaningful action would result from a report of corruption, a significant increase from 2016 (25%). However, more Victorians are simply unsure about this (37% ‘neither agree nor disagree’, 15% ‘don’t know’). One in three people (33%) agree there would be personal repercussions from reporting corruption (down from 39% in 2016). More than a quarter of Victorians (27%) are confident about being protected from victimisation, a significant increase from 2016 (20%).

Victorians who speak a language other than English are significantly more likely to feel meaningful action would result from a report of corruption (42%) and feel confident they would be protected from victimisation (33%). This is also the case for people aged between 18-34 years old (43% and 35% respectively).

Graph 6. Agreement with statements about reporting outcomes (%)

Awareness and perceptions of IBAC

Most Victorians have heard about IBAC but the level of understanding of what IBAC does is low.

Over two-thirds of Victorians (69%) have heard of IBAC, however only a little over one in 10 Victorians (13%) have a ‘good’ understanding of IBAC’s functions. For most, they only know ‘a little’ about what IBAC does (35%) or have heard the name but are ‘not sure what they do’ (21%).

Victorians aged 18-34 years and people from a culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) background were significantly less likely to have a good understanding about IBAC (10% respectively).

Graph 7. Awareness of IBAC (%)

Media reporting is the primary means by which the community hears about IBAC.

Sixty-seven per cent of those who are aware of IBAC heard about IBAC through the media in the past 12 months. Social media is not a major awareness channel overall (16% of those aware of IBAC have seen it on social media in the past 12 months), however it has greater reach among those aged 18 to 34 years (30%) and in CALD communities (22%) (who are less likely to have a good understanding about IBAC).

There is high and strong agreement among Victorians that it is important that IBAC exists.

Eight-two per cent of Victorians agree it is important that IBAC exists, including 44 per cent who strongly agree. However, less than half of Victorians (44%) agree a report to IBAC would be handled appropriately; most are unsure (29% ‘neither agree nor disagree’ and 18% ‘don’t know’). Confidence is significantly higher among people who care for someone with a disability (54%), LGBTIQ+ people (53%) and those who are university educated (48%).

Graph 8. Agreement with statements about IBAC (%)

Most Victorians are at least ‘somewhat’ confident in IBAC’s ability to inform, prevent, detect, and investigate.

Most Victorians are at least ‘confident’ (either ‘somewhat confident’, ‘confident’ or ‘very confident’) in IBAC’s ability to inform the public sector, police and community about the risks and impacts of corruption and police misconduct (70%), or to detect (71%), investigate (74%) or prevent (67%) this. More than one in 10 Victorians are ‘not confident’ in IBAC’s role in each of these functions, with a similar proportion who ‘don’t know’.

Victorians aged 18-34 years and people who identify as LGBTIQ+ are significantly more likely to report higher confidence in IBAC’s role across the measures of informing, preventing, detecting, and investigating corruption and police misconduct. By comparison, people living with a disability and those aged 55 years and over are more likely to report not being confident in IBAC’s ability across all these aspects.

Graph 9. Confidence in IBAC (%)

Among those who are not confident in IBAC’s ability in its areas of remit (around one in six of all participants provided a response), themes raised include a lack of awareness of IBAC, little knowledge and transparency about the outcomes achieved, unfavourable media reporting and a perceived lack of resourcing to enable IBAC to be effective. Comments were also made about political influence reducing or negating IBAC’s efficacy.